References used in mensuration resources

• Leech, J. 1984.. Aust. For. Res. 14(4): 333-7.
• Gregoire, T.G., Valentine, H.T. and Fernival, G.M. 1986. Estimation of bole volume by importance sampling. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 554-557.
• Goulding, C. 1979..
• Ellis and Duff (l973)
• Avery, 1967..
• Whyte, 1971. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 1(1):74-79, 1971)
• Cajander, A.K. 1926. The theory of forest types. Acta For. Fennica 29: 1-108.
• Carron, L.T. 1968. An Outline of Forest Mensuration with Special Reference to Australia. ANU Press, Chp. 15.
• Clutter, J.L., Fortson, J.C., Pienaar, L.V., Brister, G.H. and Bailey, R.L. 1983. Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. John Wiley & Sons. 333 p.
• Ferguson, I.S.F. 1979. Growth functions for radiata pine plantations. Paper presented to IUFRO Subject Group S4.01 (Mensuration, Growth and Yield) Meeting, Oxford, Sept. 16-21, 1979.
• Jackson, D.S. 1965. Species siting: climate, soil and productivity. N.Z. J. For. 10(1): 90-102.
• Jackson, D.S. 1967. A neglected criterion for assessing site factors. Proc. IUFRO Congr., Section 21, Munich.
• Pegg, R.E. 1967. Relation of slash pine site index to soil vegetation and climate in south east Queensland. Q'ld Dept. For. Res. Note No. 19.
• Turvey, N.D. 1980. A forest soil survey: II The application of soil survey information to forestry operations. Aust. For. 43:172-177.
• Turvey, N.D. 1983. Soil-type yield curves for Pinus radiata in Gippsland, Victoria. Aust. For. 46(2): 118-125.
• Spurr, S.H. 1952. Forest Inventory, Chps. 18 and 20. Roland Press Co., New York.
• Ure, J. 1950. The natural vegetation of the Kaingaroa plains as an indicator of site quality for exotic conifers. N.Z. J. For. 6(2): 112-123.
• Van Altena, A.C. 1979. Growth comparisons of slash pine and Honduras caribbean pine at Toolara. Q'ld For. Dept. Res. Note No. 28.
• Lewis, N.B., Keeves, A. and Leech, J.W. 1976. Yield Regulation in South Australian Pinus radiata Plantations, Bull. No. 23, Woods and Forests Dept. Sth. Aust., p.13-36.
• Wakeley, P.C. 1954. The growth intercept method of site classification. In: Proc. 3rd Ann. For. Symp. Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, p. 32-33.
• Ferree, M.J., Shearer, T.D. and Stone, E.J. 1958. A method of evaluating site quality in young red pine plantations. J. For. 56: 328-332.
• Wakeley, P.C. and Marrero, J. 1958. Five-year height intercept as site index in southern pine plantations. J. For. 56: 332-336.
• Beck, D.E. 1971. Polymorphic site index curves for white pine in the southern Appalachians. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-80. 8 pp.
• Clutter, C.L., Forston, J.C., Pienaar, L.V., Brister, G.H., and Bailey, R.L. 1983. Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. 333 p.
• McLintock, M.J. and Bickford, C.A. 1957. A proposed site index for red spruce in the northeast. USDA For. Serv., Northeast For. Exp. Sta., Pap. No. 93. 30 p.
• Vanclay, J. K. and Henry, N.B. 1988. Assessing site productivity of indigenous cypress pine forest in southern Queensland. Commonw. For. Rev. 67: 53-64.
• Czarnowski, Humphreys and Gentle (1971) (Ekologia Polska, 19: 295-309)

http://online.anu.edu.au/Forestry/mensuration/XREF.HTM
Cris.Brack@anu.edu.au
Tue, 7 Jan. 1997