The 3P - Centroid volume sampling described here is an efficient technique that enables one or two people to accurately determine the volume of small woodlots or plantations. It will be most suited to inventories where every tree can be visited, and to areas where no volume tables or functions are readily available.
No sophisticated instruments or tools are essential, although a calculator is very useful.
Modifying the general technique
Data recording sheet
It is possible for this inventory to be carried out by one person alone, although for safety reasons it is recommended that at least one other person is nearby and able to render assistance in case of accidents or injury. Where more than one person is involved, all guesses of tree volume should be completed by the same person at every stage.
The main survey uses a recording sheet with enough rows to record each tree in the woodlot. Use the following procedure (also shown as a flow diagram):
If the reliability of your guesses for volume has been constant, and the estimates made in steps 1 and 6 of survey were reasonable, then the precision of your volume estimate should be within the acceptable range set in step 5 of calculations.
The example data is based on a small woodlot of about 0.4 ha on the Australian National University grounds. The woodlot contains Eucalyptus globulus spp globulus planted in semi-regular rows around buildings and other structures. The form of the trees varied from poor with numerous double leaders to good with straight boles.
The inventory was designed to determine the volume of pulp (overbark) potentially available from the woodlot. Field measurements were collected in one morning by an undergraduate forestry student team of three equipped with a spiegal relaskop and 30 m tape.
The students had had relatively little experience with estimating tree volume, and this is demonstrated by the range of ratios of centroid:guess volume (1.2 to 2.1). Their use of the relaskop may also contribute to this imprecision as it apparently was only read to the nearest 5 cm. With experience, volume estimates and improved Relaskop practice would improve the CV%. This would result in fewer 3P sample trees being needed for the inventory to reach the desired reliability of 10%.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Tree No | Volume Guess | Total Height | Stump Height | Merch. Height | Cent. Height | Cent. Diam | Cent. Volume | Cent. Vol: Guess Vol. ratio |
1 | 1.5 | 32.5 | 0.1 | 100 | 9.4 | 30 | 1.15 | 0.763 |
2 | 2.0 | 33.6 | 0.1 | 100 | 9.7 | 30 | 1.18 | 0.592 |
3 | 1.5 | 31.1 | 0.1 | 100 | 9.3 | 35 | 1.49 | 0.994 |
4 | 1.0 | 30.0 | 0.1 | 100 | 9.0 | 30 | 1.06 | 1.057 |
5 | 1.7 | 34.4 | 0.1 | 100 | 10.2 | 30 | 1.21 | 0.713 |
Total | 7.7 | 4.12 | ||||||
Average | 1.5 | 0.824 | ||||||
SD | 0.196 | |||||||
CV% | 24% | |||||||
Estimate of total number of trees in the stand | 7 x 22 rows = 154 |
Total volume guess | 154 x 1.5 = 231 |
Approximate number of trees required for centroid measurement (E%=10%) | (2 x 24%)^2 / 10%^2 = 23 |
KZ (Random numbers 0-KZ) | 231 / 23 = 10 |
Note that malformed trees were not selected during this initial survey.
This method can estimate underbark or overbark volumes by entering the centroid diameter estimate (Column 7) of the recording sheet as an underbark or overbark diameter estimate respectively. All calculations remain the same.
If the tree is being climbed in order to get the centroid diameter, underbark diameter can be estimated by measuring the bark thickness at centroid height.
However, if the centroid diameter is remotely estimated (eg using pole callipers or dendrometer), and underbark volume is required, then an estimate of the underbark : overbark ratio is needed. In conifers, this ratio is reasonably constant over the length of the bole so it is possible to make appropriate measurements at a location easily managed from the ground. Measure the diameter at about 1.3 m (DBHOB) from the ground and then determine bark thickness at this point. Take four measurement of the bark thickness around the tree at 1.3 m from the ground and determine the ratio as:
Under:Overbark = (DBHOB - (0.25 x sum of four bark thicknesses)) / DBHOB
Multiply the overbark centroid diameter measured with the callipers or dendrometer by the Under:Overbark ratio and record the answer in Column 7.
The recording sheet could be easily modified to include these extra diameter and bark thickness measurements.
The general 3P centroid technique can be easily adapted to apply to larger woodlots that have easily detectable rows. Visiting only those trees in every 4th or 5th (or n'th) row, complete the entire general 3P centroid technique. The total volume estimate can be reliably determined by multiplying the figure obtained in step 3 of the final calculations by 4 or 5 (or n) respectively.
The precision of the total volume estimate may be reduced by this approach. Determine the total guessed volume for each row, then calculate the average, SD and CV% of these total row guesses. The overall precision for the total volume is calculated as:
square root ( (CV% from step 4 of the final calculations)^2 + (CV% row guesses)^2 )
If the woodlot is not planted in regular rows, but the area of the woodlot is known, then the general technique can still be modified for use. Instead of using rows in the modification suggested in the section Regular woodlots too large to visit every tree, you can use small plots.
Select about 20 random points in the woodlot and mark out a circular plot at each point. Each plot should be the same size and have a diameter big enough to include about 10 trees. Each plot then is like a row in the modification described in Regular woodlots too large to visit every tree, except that where you multiplied your estimated volume by the number of rows you skipped, in this technique you multiply the volume by the woodlot area divided by the area in all your plots.
IndexHelp
Authors
Document URL | http://online.anu.edu.au/Forestry/mensuration/3PCENT.HTM |
Editor | Cris Brack © |
Authors | Tony Brown and Cris Brack |
Last Modified Date | Mar, 9 Feb 1996 |